AT&T Provides Different Opinions On Fiber Internet

Share post:

AT&T prides itself on fiber Internet as a “superior” technology built for today and the future, because it provides symmetrical upload and download speeds of 1 Gbps or more.

AT&T also says that “there is no compelling evidence” of fiber roll-out in the United States, and that rural populations should be satisfied with non-fiber Internet access that offers only 10 Mbps upload speeds.

The difference between these two very different statements was the audience: AT&T’s message to investors about the future security of fiber and its superiority over cable and DSL, while AT&T discussed the gradual roll-out of fibre to connect more homes in metro areas where fiber is already available.

AT&T’s statement that Americans do not need fiber access was conveyed to the U.S. government, while the ISP lobbied against the government-subsidized construction of fiber lines that appear to be superior to DSL and wireless fixed-line Internet products that AT&T sells in areas where fiber is not cost-effective.

The claim that cable can easily match fiber is untrue.

The cable industry has boasted for years about future symmetrical upload speeds, but to date, no cable company has delivered these speeds to customers. Meanwhile, Comcast’s cable upload speeds range only from 5 Mbps to 35 Mbps, the standard for all major cable ISPs.

AT&T’s comments about rural people not needing fiber were given as President Joe Biden and Congress debated how to spend billions of dollars to subsidize broadband connections for areas with no or slow service.

Biden originally proposed $100 billion to build “future-proof” networks across the U.S., with priority access to funding “for broadband networks owned, operated by, or affiliated with local governments, non-profits, and co-operatives—providers with less pressure to turn profits and with a commitment to serving entire communities.”

Biden, meanwhile, agreed to $65 billion in a deal with Republicans who may not favor municipal grids as originally proposed.

Details have yet to be decided in the House and Senate, with a key question being whether the U.S. will prioritize fiber networks, which AT&T has told investors are superior to all other broadband technologies, or non-fiber networks, which AT&T claims are sufficient to lobby politicians.

For more information, read the original story in Arstechnica.

Featured Tech Jobs

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

HP’s ink subscription model: A strategy of customer ‘lock-in’ raises eyebrows and revenues

HP's chief financial officer, Marie Myers, recently discussed the company's controversial ink subscription service at the UBS Global...

Open AI delays launch of app store

OpenAI has pushed back the launch of its much-anticipated GPT store to early 2024, as revealed in a...

Sam Altman’s move to Microsoft may not happen

Will Sam Altman move to Microsoft or return to OpenAI? The answer is anything but certain. Altman, along...

Microsoft Hires Sam Altman And Greg Brockman To Spearhead New AI Research Unit

Microsoft announced that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and ex-president Greg Brockman will lead a newly formed advanced AI...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways