AI Cannot be Inventor of a Patent, Appeal Court Rules

Share post:

The Court of Appeal has ruled against Stephen Thaler in his case against the U.K. Intellectual Property Office (IPO) that AI cannot be the inventor of new patents.

Thaler had asked the IPO to grant Dabus, an artificial intelligence that he filed in 2018, the rights to two patents, one for a kind of food container and the other for a flashing light.

While the IPO initially required Thaler to name a real person as the inventor of the patents, the authority later withdrew the patent after Thaler failed to follow instructions.

The U.K. panel’s ruling states that an inventor must be a genuine human being under UK law. Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing, one of the judges involved in the decision, “Only a person can have rights. A machine cannot. A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person.”

For more information, read the original story in the BBC.

Featured Tech Jobs

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

OpenAI acknowledges “ChatGPT had a melt down”

ChatGPT had what witnesses are describing as a "meltdown" over the past day. Various reports surfaced with incidents...

OpenAI faces social media backlash with launch of Sora for text to image

OpenAI's launch of its new text-to-video model, Sora, has stirred up considerable debate and concern among the public...

Microsoft develops its own chip and network card as cheeper and faster alternative to Nvidia

Microsoft is reportedly developing its own AI server gear, including a new network card, to enhance the performance...

Adobe Acrobat introduces its own AI assistant

Adobe Acrobat is introducing an AI Assistant as a beta feature for its PDF management software, aiming to...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways