AI Cannot be Inventor of a Patent, Appeal Court Rules

Share post:

The Court of Appeal has ruled against Stephen Thaler in his case against the U.K. Intellectual Property Office (IPO) that AI cannot be the inventor of new patents.

Thaler had asked the IPO to grant Dabus, an artificial intelligence that he filed in 2018, the rights to two patents, one for a kind of food container and the other for a flashing light.

While the IPO initially required Thaler to name a real person as the inventor of the patents, the authority later withdrew the patent after Thaler failed to follow instructions.

The U.K. panel’s ruling states that an inventor must be a genuine human being under UK law. Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing, one of the judges involved in the decision, “Only a person can have rights. A machine cannot. A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person.”

For more information, read the original story in the BBC.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

Anthropic’s AI Agents Take a Big Leap: Direct Computer Control

Anthropic has unveiled a groundbreaking capability for its Claude large language model: the ability to directly interact with...

AI Agents Could Surpass Humans as Primary App Users by 2030, Accenture Predicts

AI agents are poised to transform the way we interact with digital systems, potentially becoming the primary users...

Target’s new AI is aimed at employees

Target is introducing a new generative artificial intelligence tool aimed at enhancing the efficiency of its store employees...

The good and the bad of AI generated code

Generative AI tools are transforming the coding landscape, making both skilled and novice developers more efficient. However, the...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways