Judge rules that AI can’t own copyrights

Share post:

A federal judge has ruled that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot own copyrights.

The ruling came in a case brought by Stephen Thaler, who had sued the U.S. Copyright Office after it rejected his application to copyright an artwork created by his AI system.

The judge found that human authorship is a “bedrock requirement” of copyright law, and that Thaler’s AI system did not meet that requirement.

The ruling is a setback for Thaler, who has been a vocal advocate for the rights of AI to own property. However, it is also a victory for Hollywood studios, which have been concerned about the potential for AI to be used to create copyrighted works without their permission.

The ruling is likely to be appealed, and the final decision will have implications on the ongoing contract dispute between Hollywood writers and actors.

The sources for this piece include an article in BusinessInsider.

Featured Tech Jobs

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

Canadian police need a search warrant to get your IP address: Supreme Court

An IP address is the key to unlocking a user's internet identity the court's majority

One billion dollar copyright infringement killed on appeal

The $1 billion copyright infringement verdict against Cox Communications was overturned by a federal appeals court, which ruled...

Concerns raised about National Security Agency purchasing American’s personal data from brokers

A US Senator, Ron Wyden, has raised concerns about the National Security Agency (NSA) purchasing Americans' personal data,...

eBay’s harassment ordeal ends in $3 million fine

eBay has been fined a staggering $3 million, the maximum criminal penalty, for a shocking harassment campaign against...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways