China vs. OpenAI: The AI Arms Race Gets Messy

Share post:

OpenAI is accusing Chinese AI startup DeepSeek of using its own AI-generated outputs to train a competing model—essentially copying a system that has itself faced accusations of using vast amounts of copyrighted data.

At the heart of the dispute is model distillation, a process where one AI model learns from the outputs of another, effectively mimicking its reasoning and style. OpenAI claims DeepSeek leveraged ChatGPT-4o’s responses to build its own AI assistant, which has rapidly gained popularity, topping app store charts in China. Some users even reported that DeepSeek’s chatbot openly stated it was trained on ChatGPT-4o, adding fuel to the allegations.

DeepSeek’s meteoric rise—reportedly developing a model for just $6 million compared to OpenAI’s billions—has rattled the industry. Investors and analysts are watching closely as the U.S. weighs policy responses, with former Google CEO Eric Schmidt calling it a “turning point” in the AI race. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s complaint raises deeper questions: If AI companies use public data to train their models, who really owns what in this new AI ecosystem?

The irony isn’t lost on many: OpenAI, long accused of training on copyrighted content, is now trying to draw the line on AI learning from AI. The outcome of this battle could reshape AI competition and intellectual property rules for years to come.

OpenAI Responds

OpenAI’s Sam Altman has confirmed a new model is on the way, while Alibaba claims its latest AI, Qwen 2.5-Max, surpasses OpenAI’s GPT-4o and DeepSeek’s models. Meanwhile, a Berkeley research team claims to have replicated DeepSeek’s core technology for just $30, highlighting how quickly AI innovation is spreading.

More new entrants

Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5-Max reportedly outperforms DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-4o across multiple benchmarks, challenging U.S. dominance in generative AI. At the same time, OpenAI has introduced Operator, an AI assistant that can interact with websites, click links, and automate tasks, available for $200 per month. The company is also developing O3, a new reasoning-heavy AI designed to improve problem-solving.

With China’s DeepSeek shaking up the market and new competitors emerging rapidly, AI development is becoming a high-stakes race. If Berkeley’s claim of replicating DeepSeek’s tech for just $30 proves viable, it could lower the barriers to AI innovation even further, leading to an explosion of new models.

The big question now: Can OpenAI and U.S. companies stay ahead, or is AI’s future shifting toward China and low-cost alternatives?

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

Larry Ellison Proposes Centralized National Data Repository for AI Analysis

Oracle founder Larry Ellison has proposed that governments consolidate all national data—including genomic information—into a unified database to...

US and UK Refuse To Sign AI Safety Declaration

At the recent AI Action Summit in Paris, both the United States and the United Kingdom chose not...

Thomson Reuters Wins Landmark AI Copyright Case Against Ross Intelligence

In a significant legal development, Thomson Reuters has secured a victory in the first major U.S. copyright case...

Altman Rejects Musk’s $97.4B OpenAI Bid

Elon Musk’s $97.4 billion bid to take control of OpenAI has been met with a sharp rejection from...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways