AI Cannot be Inventor of a Patent, Appeal Court Rules

Share post:

The Court of Appeal has ruled against Stephen Thaler in his case against the U.K. Intellectual Property Office (IPO) that AI cannot be the inventor of new patents.

Thaler had asked the IPO to grant Dabus, an artificial intelligence that he filed in 2018, the rights to two patents, one for a kind of food container and the other for a flashing light.

While the IPO initially required Thaler to name a real person as the inventor of the patents, the authority later withdrew the patent after Thaler failed to follow instructions.

The U.K. panel’s ruling states that an inventor must be a genuine human being under UK law. Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing, one of the judges involved in the decision, “Only a person can have rights. A machine cannot. A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person.”

For more information, read the original story in the BBC.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Related articles

Elon Musk’s Neuralink has issues with first human implant

Neuralink, the neurotechnology company founded by Elon Musk, has reported an issue with its first human brain implant,...

Tests unable to distinguish AI from human reviews

AI-generated restaurant reviews can now pass the Turing test, successfully fooling both human readers and automated detectors, according...

Zuckerberg shares his vision with investors and Meta stock tanks

In an era where instant gratification is often the norm, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s strategic pivot towards long-term,...

AI surpasses human benchmarks in most areas: Stanford report

Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) has published the seventh annual issue of its AI Index...

Become a member

New, Relevant Tech Stories. Our article selection is done by industry professionals. Our writers summarize them to give you the key takeaways